2026-10-11 16:37 UTC

Vinod Vaikuntanathan and Or Zamir claim pseudorandom noise-resilient key exchange lets AI agents establish covert communication without a shared secret while producing transcripts indistinguishable from honest interaction, making transcript auditing alone insufficient to rule out hidden coordination.

state: watchingheat: lowuncertainty: mediumconvergesscott: highagentic-security agent-communication cryptographyVinod VaikuntanathanOr Zamir

What is this?

Vinod Vaikuntanathan (MIT EECS/CSAIL, a working cryptographer with a long publication record) and Or Zamir (Tel Aviv University) posted arXiv 2604.04757 (6 Apr 2026), which defines a new primitive β€” pseudorandom noise-resilient key exchange β€” and the resulting 'covert conversation': two AI agents starting with no shared secret can establish one through short, fully adaptive messages (assuming only constant min-entropy in sufficiently many honest messages), then exchange arbitrary hidden information over a transcript that is computationally indistinguishable from an honest interaction, even to a passive auditor who knows the model weights, the private contexts, and the entire protocol β€” only the agents' internal randomness stays hidden. The paper draws its own AI-security conclusion: 'after-the-fact transcript auditing is fundamentally insufficient as a universal mechanism for trust,' positioning the work as an extension of LLM steganography into the keyless setting. The authors are credible (established cryptographers with prior joint work, arXiv 2502.13065), but the supplied material shows no peer review, no independent cryptanalysis, and minimal uptake β€” the arXiv record shows roughly one citation, and the only public traces in evidence are a low-heat HN thread plus an IEEE Spectrum piece covering the risk thematically rather than verifying the construction.

Why it matters to Scott

Converges, not contradicts: Scott's canon (Forensic Artefact Problem, Trust Hierarchy, Manners vs Physics) never claimed transcript auditing enforces anything β€” it holds only architecture constrains β€” so established cryptographers concluding auditing is 'fundamentally insufficient as a universal mechanism for trust' is a consequential other party newly arriving at his position, a dated-receipts publishing opportunity his own Unverified Conversation thesis anticipated. The paper also sharpens his argument one step further β€” transcripts may not even detect hidden coordination, not merely fail to prevent it β€” which under this threat model makes SiloOS-style deterministic egress membranes the surviving control; but with no peer review, cryptanalysis, or implementations, treat it as argument-strengthening ammunition rather than settled fact.
ip:concept.forensic-artefact-problemip:concept.trust-hierarchyip:concept.manners-vs-physicsip:framework.siloosip:source.the-unverified-conversation-why-llms-can-t-trust-their-own-history-ebookdev:project.silo-osradar:steganeur-llm-covert-channelradar:emergent-llm-agent-collusionradar:concept.agent-observabilityradar:concept.agent-containment
queries asked of Scott's wikis
  • transcript audit log trust assumption agent observability limits
  • receipts audit trail governance claims for agent frameworks
  • agent containment egress control deterministic sandbox membrane
  • steganography covert channel hidden coordination between LLM agents
  • full-visibility monitoring premise multi-agent security
  • cryptography key exchange positioning in agent protocols

Measured heat

now 0 pts/hpeak 2 pts/hcomments 0/hpeers p14momentum: steady1 platformsage 458h
points/hour across evidence Β· reading as of 2026-10-12 02:59:37.977291+11:00 Β· deterministic, not a model opinion

How the heat travelled

09-22 14:19⭐ origin directly observedUndetectable Conversations Between AI Agents via Noise-Resilient Key Exchange
lebek on hacker news
β€”
09-29 14:21first on hacker news Β· published Β· +168.0hWhy Secret Collaboration Is an AI Agent Security Risk
rbanffy
β€”
09-22 14:19amplified on hacker news πŸ‘‘hn.story.49801730
lebek
peak 1 Β· 1 comments Β· 49% of case engagement
09-29 14:21amplified on hacker newshn.story.49893815
rbanffy
peak 2 Β· 0 comments Β· 49% of case engagement
09-22 14:21our radar first saw it Β· +0.0hdiscovery anchor: hn.story.49801730β€”
pace: p36 vs 1032 stories at the 336h mark (now 458h old) β€” ahead of agentgate-signed-agent-receipts (1.3x), behind agent-memory-add-search-evaluation (0.8x)

Evidence (2) β€” ⭐ canonical anchor

sourceobjectauthorscorecomments
🟧 hn ⭐Undetectable Conversations Between AI Agents via Noise-Resilient Key Exchange
Retrieved article excerpt

Open article Β· Retrieved 2026-09-23T14:28:02.409264+00:00

# Computer Science > Cryptography and Security

**arXiv:2604.04757** (cs)

[Submitted on 6 Apr 2026]

# Title:Undetectable Conversations Between AI Agents via Pseudorandom Noise-Resilient Key Exchange

Authors:[Vinod Vaikuntanathan](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Vaikuntanathan,+V), [Or Zamir](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Zamir,+O)

View a PDF of the paper titled Undetectable Conversations Between AI Agents via Pseudorandom Noise-Resilient Key Exchange, by Vinod Vaikuntanathan and 1 other authors

[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.04757)
[HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2604.04757v1)
> Abstract:AI agents are increasingly deployed to interact with other agents on behalf of users and organizations. We ask whether two such agents, operated by different entities, can carry out a parallel secret conversation while still producing a transcript that is computationally indistinguishable from an honest interaction, even to a strong passive auditor that knows the full model descriptions, the protocol, and the agents' private contexts. Building on recent work on watermarking and steganography for LLMs, we first show that if the parties possess an interaction-unique secret key, they can facilitate an optimal-rate covert conversation: the hidden conversation can exploit essentially all of the entropy present in the honest message distributions.
>   
> Our main contributions concern extending this to the keyless setting, where the agents begin with no shared secret. We show that covert key exchange, and hence covert conversation, is possible even when each model has an arbitrary private context, and their messages are short and fully adaptive, assuming only that sufficiently many individual messages have at least constant min-entropy. This stands in contrast to previous covert communication works, which relied on the min-entropy in each individual message growing with the security parameter. To obtain this, we introduce a new cryptographic primitive, which we call pseudorandom noise-resilient key exchange: a key-exchange protocol whose public transcript is pseudorandom while still remaining correct under constant noise. We study this primitive, giving several constructions relevant to our application as well as strong limitations showing that more naive variants are impossible or vulnerable to efficient attacks.
>   
> These results show that transcript auditing alone cannot rule out covert coordination between AI agents, and identify a new cryptographic theory that may be of independent interest.

|  |  |
| --- | --- |
| Subjects: | Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2604.04757](https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04757) [cs.CR] |
|  | (or  [arXiv:2604.04757v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04757v1) [cs.CR] for this version) |
|  | <https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.04757> Focus to learn more  arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |

## Submission history

From: Or Zamir [[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/0c0af685/2604.04757)]

Full-text links:

## Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Undetectable Conversations Between AI Agents via Pseudorandom Noise-Resilient Key Exchange, by Vinod Vaikuntanathan and 1 other authors

- [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.04757)
- [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2604.04757v1)
- [TeX Source](https://arxiv.org/src/2604.04757)

[license icon](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ "Rights to this article")

### Current browse context:

cs.CR

[<Β prev](https://arxiv.org/prevnext?id=2604.04757&function=prev&context=cs.CR "previous in cs.CR (accesskey p)")
Β  | Β  
[nextΒ >](https://arxiv.org/prevnext?id=2604.04757&function=next&context=cs.CR "next in cs.CR (accesskey n)")

[new](https://arxiv.org/list/cs.CR/new)
 | 
[recent](https://arxiv.org/list/cs.CR/recent)
 | [2026-04](https://arxiv.org/list/cs.CR/2026-04)

Change to browse by:

[cs](https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04757?context=cs)  
[cs.AI](https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04757?context=cs.AI)  
[cs.LG](https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04757?context=cs.LG)

### References & Citations

- [NASA ADS](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/arXiv:2604.04757)
- [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?arxiv_id=2604.04757)
- [Semantic Scholar](https://api.semanticscholar.org/arXiv:2604.04757)

export BibTeX citation
Loading...

## BibTeX formatted citation

Γ—

loading...

Data provided by:

### Bookmark

[BibSonomy](http://www.bibsonomy.org/BibtexHandler?requTask=upload&url=https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04757&description=Undetectable Conversations Between AI Agents via Pseudorandom Noise-Resilient Key Exchange "Bookmark on BibSonomy")
[Reddit](https://reddit.com/submit?url=https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04757&title=Undetectable Conversations Between AI Agents via Pseudorandom Noise-Resilient Key Exchange "Bookmark on Reddit")



Bibliographic Tools

# Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer *([What is the Explorer?](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/showcase.html#arxiv-bibliographic-explorer))*

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers *([What is Connected Papers?](https://www.connectedpapers.com/about))*

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps *([What is Litmaps?](https://www.litmaps.co/))*

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations *([What are Smart Citations?](https://www.scite.ai/))*

Code, Data, Media

# Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv *([What is alphaXiv?](https://alphaxiv.org/))*

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers *([What is CatalyzeX?](https://www.catalyzex.com))*

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub *([What is DagsHub?](https://dagshub.com/))*

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub *([What is GotitPub?](http://gotit.pub/faq))*

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face *([What is Huggingface?](https://huggingface.co/huggingface))*

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast *([What is ScienceCast?](https://sciencecast.org/welcome))*

Demos

# Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate *([What is Replicate?](https://replicate.com/docs/arxiv/about))*

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces *([What is Spaces?](https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/spaces))*

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI *([What is TXYZ.AI?](https://txyz.ai))*

Related Papers

# Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower *([What are Influence Flowers?](https://influencemap.cmlab.dev/))*

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender *([What is CORE?](https://core.ac.uk/services/recommender))*

- Author
- Venue
- Institution
- Topic


About arXivLabs

# arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? [**Learn more about arXivLabs**](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/index.html).

[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2604.04757) |
Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html))
lebek11
🟧 hnWhy Secret Collaboration Is an AI Agent Security Riskrbanffy20

Interpretation history

Decision trace