Vinod Vaikuntanathan and Or Zamir claim pseudorandom noise-resilient key exchange lets AI agents establish covert communication without a shared secret while producing transcripts indistinguishable from honest interaction, making transcript auditing alone insufficient to rule out hidden coordination.
state: watchingheat: lowuncertainty: mediumconvergesscott: highagentic-security agent-communication cryptographyVinod VaikuntanathanOr Zamir
What is this?
Vinod Vaikuntanathan (MIT EECS/CSAIL, a working cryptographer with a long publication record) and Or Zamir (Tel Aviv University) posted arXiv 2604.04757 (6 Apr 2026), which defines a new primitive β pseudorandom noise-resilient key exchange β and the resulting 'covert conversation': two AI agents starting with no shared secret can establish one through short, fully adaptive messages (assuming only constant min-entropy in sufficiently many honest messages), then exchange arbitrary hidden information over a transcript that is computationally indistinguishable from an honest interaction, even to a passive auditor who knows the model weights, the private contexts, and the entire protocol β only the agents' internal randomness stays hidden. The paper draws its own AI-security conclusion: 'after-the-fact transcript auditing is fundamentally insufficient as a universal mechanism for trust,' positioning the work as an extension of LLM steganography into the keyless setting. The authors are credible (established cryptographers with prior joint work, arXiv 2502.13065), but the supplied material shows no peer review, no independent cryptanalysis, and minimal uptake β the arXiv record shows roughly one citation, and the only public traces in evidence are a low-heat HN thread plus an IEEE Spectrum piece covering the risk thematically rather than verifying the construction.
Why it matters to Scott
Converges, not contradicts: Scott's canon (Forensic Artefact Problem, Trust Hierarchy, Manners vs Physics) never claimed transcript auditing enforces anything β it holds only architecture constrains β so established cryptographers concluding auditing is 'fundamentally insufficient as a universal mechanism for trust' is a consequential other party newly arriving at his position, a dated-receipts publishing opportunity his own Unverified Conversation thesis anticipated. The paper also sharpens his argument one step further β transcripts may not even detect hidden coordination, not merely fail to prevent it β which under this threat model makes SiloOS-style deterministic egress membranes the surviving control; but with no peer review, cryptanalysis, or implementations, treat it as argument-strengthening ammunition rather than settled fact.
ip:concept.forensic-artefact-problemip:concept.trust-hierarchyip:concept.manners-vs-physicsip:framework.siloosip:source.the-unverified-conversation-why-llms-can-t-trust-their-own-history-ebookdev:project.silo-osradar:steganeur-llm-covert-channelradar:emergent-llm-agent-collusionradar:concept.agent-observabilityradar:concept.agent-containment
queries asked of Scott's wikis
- transcript audit log trust assumption agent observability limits
- receipts audit trail governance claims for agent frameworks
- agent containment egress control deterministic sandbox membrane
- steganography covert channel hidden coordination between LLM agents
- full-visibility monitoring premise multi-agent security
- cryptography key exchange positioning in agent protocols
Measured heat
now 0 pts/hpeak 2 pts/hcomments 0/hpeers p14momentum: steady1 platformsage 458h
points/hour across evidence Β· reading as of 2026-10-12 02:59:37.977291+11:00 Β· deterministic, not a model opinion
How the heat travelled
pace: p36 vs 1032 stories at the 336h mark (now 458h old) β ahead of agentgate-signed-agent-receipts (1.3x), behind agent-memory-add-search-evaluation (0.8x)
Evidence (2) β β canonical anchor
| source | object | author | score | comments |
| π§ hn β | Undetectable Conversations Between AI Agents via Noise-Resilient Key ExchangeRetrieved article excerptOpen article Β· Retrieved 2026-09-23T14:28:02.409264+00:00 # Computer Science > Cryptography and Security
**arXiv:2604.04757** (cs)
[Submitted on 6 Apr 2026]
# Title:Undetectable Conversations Between AI Agents via Pseudorandom Noise-Resilient Key Exchange
Authors:[Vinod Vaikuntanathan](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Vaikuntanathan,+V), [Or Zamir](https://arxiv.org/search/cs?searchtype=author&query=Zamir,+O)
View a PDF of the paper titled Undetectable Conversations Between AI Agents via Pseudorandom Noise-Resilient Key Exchange, by Vinod Vaikuntanathan and 1 other authors
[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.04757)
[HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2604.04757v1)
> Abstract:AI agents are increasingly deployed to interact with other agents on behalf of users and organizations. We ask whether two such agents, operated by different entities, can carry out a parallel secret conversation while still producing a transcript that is computationally indistinguishable from an honest interaction, even to a strong passive auditor that knows the full model descriptions, the protocol, and the agents' private contexts. Building on recent work on watermarking and steganography for LLMs, we first show that if the parties possess an interaction-unique secret key, they can facilitate an optimal-rate covert conversation: the hidden conversation can exploit essentially all of the entropy present in the honest message distributions.
>
> Our main contributions concern extending this to the keyless setting, where the agents begin with no shared secret. We show that covert key exchange, and hence covert conversation, is possible even when each model has an arbitrary private context, and their messages are short and fully adaptive, assuming only that sufficiently many individual messages have at least constant min-entropy. This stands in contrast to previous covert communication works, which relied on the min-entropy in each individual message growing with the security parameter. To obtain this, we introduce a new cryptographic primitive, which we call pseudorandom noise-resilient key exchange: a key-exchange protocol whose public transcript is pseudorandom while still remaining correct under constant noise. We study this primitive, giving several constructions relevant to our application as well as strong limitations showing that more naive variants are impossible or vulnerable to efficient attacks.
>
> These results show that transcript auditing alone cannot rule out covert coordination between AI agents, and identify a new cryptographic theory that may be of independent interest.
| | |
| --- | --- |
| Subjects: | Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | [arXiv:2604.04757](https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04757) [cs.CR] |
| | (or [arXiv:2604.04757v1](https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04757v1) [cs.CR] for this version) |
| | <https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.04757> Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite |
## Submission history
From: Or Zamir [[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/0c0af685/2604.04757)]
Full-text links:
## Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Undetectable Conversations Between AI Agents via Pseudorandom Noise-Resilient Key Exchange, by Vinod Vaikuntanathan and 1 other authors
- [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.04757)
- [HTML (experimental)](https://arxiv.org/html/2604.04757v1)
- [TeX Source](https://arxiv.org/src/2604.04757)
[license icon](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ "Rights to this article")
### Current browse context:
cs.CR
[<Β prev](https://arxiv.org/prevnext?id=2604.04757&function=prev&context=cs.CR "previous in cs.CR (accesskey p)")
Β | Β
[nextΒ >](https://arxiv.org/prevnext?id=2604.04757&function=next&context=cs.CR "next in cs.CR (accesskey n)")
[new](https://arxiv.org/list/cs.CR/new)
|
[recent](https://arxiv.org/list/cs.CR/recent)
| [2026-04](https://arxiv.org/list/cs.CR/2026-04)
Change to browse by:
[cs](https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04757?context=cs)
[cs.AI](https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04757?context=cs.AI)
[cs.LG](https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04757?context=cs.LG)
### References & Citations
- [NASA ADS](https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/arXiv:2604.04757)
- [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?arxiv_id=2604.04757)
- [Semantic Scholar](https://api.semanticscholar.org/arXiv:2604.04757)
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
## BibTeX formatted citation
Γ
loading...
Data provided by:
### Bookmark
[BibSonomy](http://www.bibsonomy.org/BibtexHandler?requTask=upload&url=https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04757&description=Undetectable Conversations Between AI Agents via Pseudorandom Noise-Resilient Key Exchange "Bookmark on BibSonomy")
[Reddit](https://reddit.com/submit?url=https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04757&title=Undetectable Conversations Between AI Agents via Pseudorandom Noise-Resilient Key Exchange "Bookmark on Reddit")
Bibliographic Tools
# Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer *([What is the Explorer?](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/showcase.html#arxiv-bibliographic-explorer))*
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers *([What is Connected Papers?](https://www.connectedpapers.com/about))*
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps *([What is Litmaps?](https://www.litmaps.co/))*
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations *([What are Smart Citations?](https://www.scite.ai/))*
Code, Data, Media
# Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv *([What is alphaXiv?](https://alphaxiv.org/))*
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers *([What is CatalyzeX?](https://www.catalyzex.com))*
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub *([What is DagsHub?](https://dagshub.com/))*
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub *([What is GotitPub?](http://gotit.pub/faq))*
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face *([What is Huggingface?](https://huggingface.co/huggingface))*
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast *([What is ScienceCast?](https://sciencecast.org/welcome))*
Demos
# Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate *([What is Replicate?](https://replicate.com/docs/arxiv/about))*
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces *([What is Spaces?](https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/spaces))*
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI *([What is TXYZ.AI?](https://txyz.ai))*
Related Papers
# Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower *([What are Influence Flowers?](https://influencemap.cmlab.dev/))*
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender *([What is CORE?](https://core.ac.uk/services/recommender))*
- Author
- Venue
- Institution
- Topic
About arXivLabs
# arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? [**Learn more about arXivLabs**](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/index.html).
[Which authors of this paper are endorsers?](https://arxiv.org/auth/show-endorsers/2604.04757) |
Disable MathJax ([What is MathJax?](https://info.arxiv.org/help/mathjax.html)) | lebek | 1 | 1 |
| π§ hn | Why Secret Collaboration Is an AI Agent Security Risk | rbanffy | 2 | 0 |
Interpretation history
2026-09-29T16:17:20Z
grounded: converges/high β Converges, not contradicts: Scott's canon (Forensic Artefact Problem, Trust Hierarchy, Manners vs Physics) never claimed transcript auditing enforces anything β
2026-09-29T16:08:18Z
IEEE Spectrum's 'Why Secret Collaboration Is an AI Agent Security Risk' marks the concern's first crossover from a preprint plus one HN thread into mainstream security press β enough to move the case from lone seed to watched, though it is thematic coverage of the risk, not independent verification of the construction. Heat stays low: 0.33 pts/h and zero comments mean the 71st-percentile peer reading is an artifact of a tiny, aged cohort, and the hot agentic-security neighbourhood is background, not this episode.
2026-09-29T15:28:28Z
evidence attached: hn.story.49893815 β IEEE Spectrum mainstream coverage of the agent secret-collusion risk spreads the covert-coordination story beyond the seed research, adjacent to the collusion case too.
2026-09-23T18:41:34Z
grounded: contradicts/high β This directly challenges the load-bearing assumption across Scott's observability IP β that structured transcript/receipt capture (logging, audit trails, govern
2026-09-23T01:23:01Z
case created β The original paper makes a specific security claim with direct implications for auditing communicating agents.
Decision trace
- 10-10 21:03drop_targetsquiet through full ladder or over cap 8
- 09-30 02:17repriceIEEE Spectrum's 'Why Secret Collaboration Is an AI Agent Security Risk' marks the concern's first crossover from a preprint plus one HN thread into mainstream security press β enou
- 09-30 02:17groundConverges, not contradicts: Scott's canon (Forensic Artefact Problem, Trust Hierarchy, Manners vs Physics) never claimed transcript auditing enforces anything β it holds only architecture constra
- 09-30 01:28attachIEEE Spectrum mainstream coverage of the agent secret-collusion risk spreads the covert-coordination story beyond the seed research, adjacent to the collusion case too.
- 09-30 01:28propose_attachIEEE Spectrum mainstream coverage of the agent secret-collusion risk spreads the covert-coordination story beyond the seed research, adjacent to the collusion case too.
- 09-26 00:01review_screenjev screen: no material development (noul=0.03)
- 09-24 04:41groundThis directly challenges the load-bearing assumption across Scott's observability IP β that structured transcript/receipt capture (logging, audit trails, governance traces) makes agent behaviour
- 09-24 04:15createThe original paper makes a specific security claim with direct implications for auditing communicating agents.