OpenAI investigation or further user reports will determine whether Codex Work has a cross-tenant isolation flaw that exposes prompts or project context from unrelated customers.
state: expiredheat: lowuncertainty: highconvergesscott: mediumagentic-security data-isolation coding-agentsOpenAIDeliveroo
What is this?
A user report alleges that OpenAI’s Codex Work exposed prompts or project context belonging to unrelated customers, suggesting a possible cross-tenant isolation failure. The supplied snippets do not corroborate that specific incident, connect it to Deliveroo, or report an OpenAI investigation; they only document separate Codex-related risks involving local credentials, unintended screen capture, and previously patched vulnerabilities. Whether a cross-tenant leak occurred therefore remains unverified from the available material.
Why it matters to Scott
If confirmed, the alleged cross-tenant leak would provide a concrete dated receipt for Scott’s claim that capable coding agents require structural data-scope enforcement and preferably single-tenant execution, directly supporting SiloOS and OpenClaw’s architecture. The report is currently uncorroborated, so it warrants monitoring rather than a firm security conclusion; the radar already tracks adjacent Codex confidentiality and cross-user exposure cases, but not this specific alleged incident.
ip:framework.siloosip:concept.capability-scope-separationdev:concept.single-tenant-ai-appliancedev:project.openclawradar:concept.coding-agent-securityradar:codex-private-repo-uploadradar:prism-paper-leak
queries asked of Scott's wikis
- coding-agent cross-tenant isolation
- agent workspace data boundaries
- multi-tenant context leakage in AI systems
- coding-agent prompt and repository confidentiality
- sandboxing versus tenant isolation for agents
- incident response for agentic data exposure
Measured heat
no measured readings yet — the hourly heat pass fills this in
How the heat travelled
no chain yet — the hourly chain pass fills this in
Evidence (1) — ⭐ canonical anchor
Interpretation history
2026-08-28T15:38:50Z
Repeated rechecks produced no independent incident, private-source match, reproducible artifact, or OpenAI acknowledgment, while the public Deliveroo pull request remains a plausible source for the observed material. The monitoring window has faded without substantiating a cross-tenant leak.
2026-08-26T14:39:57Z
The refreshed discussion still supplies no independent report, private-source match, reproducible artifact, or OpenAI acknowledgment. Public-repository retrieval or hallucination remains the stronger explanation, so the cross-tenant hypothesis has not advanced.
2026-08-26T09:25:09Z
Refreshed comments add no independent report, reproducible artifact, or OpenAI acknowledgment; discussion continues to favor public-repository retrieval or hallucination over a demonstrated cross-tenant leak. The allegation remains worth monitoring but has not strengthened.
2026-08-25T22:33:38Z
The refreshed discussion introduces a plausible benign explanation: the Deliveroo material may derive from a public repository or pull request rather than another customer’s private workspace. This weakens the cross-tenant interpretation but neither reconstructs the displayed prompt nor disproves the allegation.
2026-08-25T16:41:26Z
The re-observation adds no corroboration, acknowledgment, or reproducible artifact; this remains a single anecdotal allegation, and declining engagement does not change its substance.
2026-08-25T16:29:46Z
grounded: converges/medium — If confirmed, the alleged cross-tenant leak would provide a concrete dated receipt for Scott’s claim that capable coding agents require structural data-scope en
2026-08-25T16:27:24Z
case created — A specific alleged cross-customer disclosure is consequential enough to track, but currently rests on one anecdotal report.
Decision trace
- 08-29 01:38expireRepeated rechecks produced no independent incident, private-source match, reproducible artifact, or OpenAI acknowledgment, while the public Deliveroo pull request remains a plausible source for the ob
- 08-29 01:38alert_silentThe only delta is a stale re-observation with no new evidence; there is nothing consequential to surface unless a second incident, proof of private provenance, or an OpenAI response emerges.
- 08-29 01:38alert_routeThe only delta is a stale re-observation with no new evidence; there is nothing consequential to surface unless a second incident, proof of private provenance, or an OpenAI response emerges.
- 08-27 00:39repriceThe refreshed discussion still supplies no independent report, private-source match, reproducible artifact, or OpenAI acknowledgment. Public-repository retrieval or hallucination remains the stronger
- 08-27 00:39alert_silentThe delta is only another comment refresh around already-known explanations and does not establish that private customer data crossed tenant boundaries; wait for a second incident, a reconstruction pr
- 08-27 00:39alert_routeThe delta is only another comment refresh around already-known explanations and does not establish that private customer data crossed tenant boundaries; wait for a second incident, a reconstruction pr
- 08-27 00:21sensor_dirtycomment_update
- 08-26 19:25repriceRefreshed comments add no independent report, reproducible artifact, or OpenAI acknowledgment; discussion continues to favor public-repository retrieval or hallucination over a demonstrated cross-tena
- 08-26 19:25alert_silentThe new delta is only repetitive discussion around already-known benign explanations, not evidence that private customer data crossed tenant boundaries; it can wait for a second report, reconstruction
- 08-26 19:25alert_routeThe new delta is only repetitive discussion around already-known benign explanations, not evidence that private customer data crossed tenant boundaries; it can wait for a second report, reconstruction
- 08-26 19:21sensor_dirtycomment_update
- 08-26 10:21sensor_dirtyengagement_update
- 08-26 08:33repriceThe refreshed discussion introduces a plausible benign explanation: the Deliveroo material may derive from a public repository or pull request rather than another customer’s private workspace. This we
- 08-26 08:33alert_silentNo new report, reproducible artifact, or OpenAI acknowledgment establishes a cross-tenant disclosure; the only substantive addition points toward public-source retrieval, so this can wait for corrobor
- 08-26 08:33alert_routeNo new report, reproducible artifact, or OpenAI acknowledgment establishes a cross-tenant disclosure; the only substantive addition points toward public-source retrieval, so this can wait for corrobor
- 08-26 06:21sensor_dirtyengagement_update
- 08-26 04:22sensor_dirtycomment_update
- 08-26 02:41repriceThe re-observation adds no corroboration, acknowledgment, or reproducible artifact; this remains a single anecdotal allegation, and declining engagement does not change its substance.
- 08-26 02:41alert_silentThere is no consequential new delta to surface: the original report is unchanged and still insufficient to establish that a cross-tenant disclosure occurred.
- 08-26 02:41alert_routeThere is no consequential new delta to surface: the original report is unchanged and still insufficient to establish that a cross-tenant disclosure occurred.
- 08-26 02:38alert_silentA single low-engagement Reddit report alleges unrelated customer context appeared in Codex Work, but there is no corroboration, first-party acknowledgement, reproducible artifact, or established root
- 08-26 02:38surface_candidateA single low-engagement Reddit report alleges unrelated customer context appeared in Codex Work, but there is no corroboration, first-party acknowledgement, reproducible artifact, or established root
- 08-26 02:38alert_routeA single low-engagement Reddit report alleges unrelated customer context appeared in Codex Work, but there is no corroboration, first-party acknowledgement, reproducible artifact, or established root
- 08-26 02:29groundIf confirmed, the alleged cross-tenant leak would provide a concrete dated receipt for Scott’s claim that capable coding agents require structural data-scope enforcement and preferably single-tenant e
- 08-26 02:27createA specific alleged cross-customer disclosure is consequential enough to track, but currently rests on one anecdotal report.